The crazy week of RISC OS FR
Pages: 1 2
Clive Semmens (2335) 3276 posts |
Sorry about the 1F44D fudd and confusion! I don’t really know the limitations of NetSurf 8~( I do most of my internetting on the Mac – even downloading things for the Pi, and uploading things from it, now that with help from this wonderful community the Pi can talk to our NAS, and the Mac can talk directly to the Pi. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Oh look, a Frenchie uses DailyMotion instead of YouTube. ;-)
It’s not NetSurf. Well, it is, but it isn’t. The colourful characters that you see in your Mac’s browser are called “emoji”, and they are basically multicolour font glyphs. I’m rather partial to the facepalm one myself. ;-) Now, the thing is that:
|
Clive Semmens (2335) 3276 posts |
You don’t say! :D
Now that’s what I should have realized myself but didn’t think about. |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
It’s OK, I mentioned colour names and such and actually used the name Nemo, and he still didn’t appear. |
David Feugey (2125) 2709 posts |
I will propose videos for download on the RISC OS FR website… later :) |
Clive Semmens (2335) 3276 posts |
ROFL |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Did you try saying his name three times?
I think we all already know that he’s not exactly impressed with FontManager’s “cool in the eighties, sucks in the twenties1” behaviour. 1 I added a year because, what’s this decade called? “tens” just doesn’t sound right. That said, “twenties” implies flappers, art deco, cloche hats, saddle shoes, and women with weird things in their hair… not next ····ing year! |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
Consecutively, or in total across the past few days? For the latter I’m pretty sure I’ve exceeded.
Did you look that stuff up? Most of those fashion bits went right over my head. Then again any fashion item in the last 50 years has always gone right over my head. End. |
nemo (145) 2546 posts |
Yeah, it’s been six months since I last visited. I can be contacted elsewhere you know. On Jan 1 (Happy New Year) DavidS wrote
I’m trying really hard not to swear. Unicode is NOT 16bit. UNICODE IS NOT 16 BIT. UNICODE IS NOT SIXTEEN BITUnicode is 21bit, and truncating codepoints to 16bit is wrong, bad, awful, embarrassing. Need I go on? It’s one thing to not be able to display a character (groans), it’s quite another to not even be able to get the number right. Cripes.Rick said
<Tenses pedantry muscles>
<Rolls sleeves up> Right. ‘emoji’ in the Unicode sense covers two different but related concepts. • Symbols You can blame Japanese mobile phones mainly. Unicode defines a large number of single-codepoint emoji symbols, and also a lot of multi-codepoint composite emoji symbols – grapheme clusters. However, it is perfectly acceptable to display these in a single colour. For example, here are some single-codepoint emoji (right) and emoji code sequences (left) in RISC OS: However, a browser may choose to use a more colourful representation. That might be done with a font, but it’s often done simply with loads of PNGs (as Twitter does, for example). There are a couple of technologies for producing coloured fonts, but they’re all a bit flawed honestly. I’d cut FontManager some slack here… that is, if it could actually display any emoji at all. <facepalm emoji>. The cartoonified versions of existing glyphs are particularly problematic (again, blame the Japanese). For example, the emojified version of the pack-of-cards hearts suit is blue. Yeah. I know. <vomit emoji> |
Pages: 1 2