NetSurf google search
Jean-Michel BRUCK (3009) 380 posts |
Since this morning impossible to use Google Search with !Netsurf or !Iris
I tested on ARMX6, RPi4 and Windows emulator. If you have any idea!!! Thanks |
David J. Ruck (33) 1675 posts |
!NetSurf still works here, you must have been naughty. Wait a few hours and try again. |
Jean-Michel BRUCK (3009) 380 posts |
FYI !Netsurf Google search works again on ARMX6 after removing URL and Cookies files in Choices:Netsurf On the other hand !NetSurf google search on RPi4 does not work even after applying the method above. The problem seems to have occurred this morning after installing !Netsurf under Windows RpEmu!!! |
Rick Murray (539) 13958 posts |
I’m in France. Works with NetSurf here (3B+). Sometimes the Googlebot can get confused and mistake normal activity for a bot. Which is ironic, really. Anyway, the special checking page has all sorts of trickery designed to thwart machines, there’s not much hope of it working correctly on RISC OS. Wait a while, or try to get that page to appear on, say, Android. Thanks to Googley collusion, Chrome will tell Google my Android account info so I rarely get these messages and the few times I do I just visit Google using Chrome and they magically go away. So, in my case, if the Captcha is solved correctly the first time, it’s clearly a bot. 😂 I would say “if Google doesn’t work, try DuckDuckGo”… but I’ve set DDG to the default on one of my phones and I find the results to be… eccentric and missing quite a lot. 🤷🏻♀️ |
Stuart Painting (5389) 727 posts |
I have a somewhat different problem when using NetSurf 3.11. I will admit I haven’t tried a Google search for several months.
By the looks of things, Google search now insists on Javascript, and Netsurf’s Javascript engine isn’t up to the job. |
Jean-Michel BRUCK (3009) 380 posts |
As Rick says on the empty page there is a Captcha (!Iris displays it but it doesn’t go any further) By cleaning choices:www.netsurf, google search started working again, phew (ouf)!
:-) |
Rick Murray (539) 13958 posts |
What’s your URL? Just going to google.com works for me, and pops up a non-fancy page. Granted, much of the rest of Google doesn’t work but you can get as far as basic search using NetSurf. |
Stuart Painting (5389) 727 posts |
google.com, google.co.uk and google.fr all produce the same results (i.e. the “cookie” page followed by “Enable Javascript” if not already enabled, then a blank page). I’ve tried running a Google search from another device on the same subnet (Firefox on macOS, in case that’s important) but it didn’t change Netsurf’s subsequent behaviour one iota. |
Chris Mahoney (1684) 2174 posts |
Same here. Whether I go directly to Google’s site or use the search box on the NetSurf default home page, I get a “Turn on JavaScript to keep searching” page. Enabling NetSurf’s rudimentary JavaScript support then gave the “unusual activity” message. |
David Pitt (9872) 368 posts |
Calling Google insecurely, http not https, from Netsurf with Javascript enable looks to be initially more successful but not if the “unusual activity” message has been seen. |
Rob Heaton (274) 516 posts |
Looks like a wider issue, not just NetSurf. TechCrunch article |
Rick Murray (539) 13958 posts |
Yup. Just tried on Firefox disabling scripting. Google tells me to turn it on. Bing doesn’t appear to work. DuckDuckGo, on the other hand, does work, nor does it give any indication of why (but then it’s probably that AI junk getting in the way). So, sayonara Google. I do have to laugh at the rapacious bastards pilfering everything in sight to train their AI getting upset that somebody else might be scraping them. We, as a species, are clearly on the fast track to mediocre irrelevance. You know, the movie Idiocracy wasn’t supposed to be a prophecy. |
Chris Mahoney (1684) 2174 posts |
That article is actually rather “funny”.
Spamming requires posting things. Doing a search ≠ posting things. Requiring JavaScript to perform a search does not protect against spam.
If that’s true then it’s due to Google’s own design. There is no reason that HTML search results couldn’t contain the same data as the JavaScript-based results.
Again, there’s no reason this couldn’t be provided via HTML. It’s not like one data format is magically more “stale” than another. I suspect this is actually another step in the “let’s ram AI down people’s throats” mission that seems to be prevalent in large technology companies. The (often-useless) AI summaries, as currently implemented, do require JavaScript. Without JS, you don’t see them, and of course we can’t possibly have that! |
Rick Murray (539) 13958 posts |
I looked up a movie that I saw on Netflix the other day, I don’t recall the name, and the so summary was about as useful as being hit in the face with a wet fish. (this is paraphrased from memory)
Very useful. 🤦🏻♀️ |
Paolo Fabio Zaino (28) 1915 posts |
Side note: duckduckgo with my LaunchPad and NS works fine (even with JS disabled in NetSurf), I haven’t been using a search engine directly in a long time thought. As for Google, yes, they now require JavaScript because the modern world is all about creating bots that try to extract data from websites. JavaScript helps Google to detect such bots. The situation is so bad that I created one to help reduce the load on websites. However, some people are so misguided that they insist on writing poorly designed scrapers in Python and JavaScript to bombard websites, instead of using something that simulates a real human in every aspect. They avoid proper simulation because it makes the process slower, and apparently, they can’t wait. |
Paolo Fabio Zaino (28) 1915 posts |
I would not recommend to enable JS in NS. While the engine works, it doesn’t seem to support any of the checks Google JS tries to do, so yes it will result google identifying the browser as a bot and send you back the page for the bots. The amount of checks they make is substatial, so I would expect aso Iris to fail the test, given I have seen it failing the test with ChatGPT already. |
Paolo Fabio Zaino (28) 1915 posts |
It’s either DDG or another minor engine, but it won’t be google anymore, sorry. |
David Pitt (9872) 368 posts |
This is just to clarify DuckDuckGo’s Javascript usage options, something I was not aware of. (Or had forgotten.) DuckDuckGo does offer Non-JavaScript Versions of DuckDuckGo Search A plain HTML search is at https://html.duckduckgo.com/html and the full fat search is https://duckduckgo.com With Javascript enabled Netsurf fails to start with the Javascript version of DuckDuckGo but with Javascript disabled it is redirected to the Javascript free search. Calling the HTML search works just fine. Iris’s homepage DuckDuckGo search calls the HTML version and attempting to call the Javascript search goes to a Captcha which it passes. HTH. |
Sprow (202) 1164 posts |
If you’re suffering from Google withdrawal symptoms, it’s mildly amusing to note that the Javascript enabled Browse is accepted, and also passes the usual cookie confirmation check. Maybe a former Acorn developer now works at Alphabet and has put in a special test for old times’ sake? |
Jean-Michel BRUCK (3009) 380 posts |
Hi, Being able to search the web without advertising is great. By the way, thanks Google for making changes without warning users… |