RTC on Pandaboard
Pages: 1 2
Chris Evans (457) 1614 posts |
Not a dry joint, a bit more embarrassing than that: no crystal had been fitted by our assemblers:-/ |
George T. Greenfield (154) 748 posts |
“… a batch of 1080 Pi RTCs and now one from 50 Panda RTCs.” |
Chris Evans (457) 1614 posts |
Might be for RTC modules on their own. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Mmm… Twice the memory, twice the cores, possibly twice the speed, twice the video… Naaaah, it’s the same really, innit? ;-) |
Malcolm Hussain-Gambles (1596) 811 posts |
Oh for an ArndaleRO……. |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
Cheap rate or the Octa? If you’re dreaming go big(ger) |
Chris Evans (457) 1614 posts |
Sorry I thought it was clear that I was talking about the volume of sales not their specs. With the exception of monitors supported1 the PandaRO wins hands down on specs. 1A Pi can do 1920×120060Hz (It also tries to do 2048x1152 but there is a bug which makes it unusable). A Panda based system can do 1920x1080 60Hz but only 1920×1200 at low refresh rate which very few monitors support.
|
David R. Lane (77) 766 posts |
A final thought on my RTC board (a CJE Micro’s one) problem, now resolved, is that it would have helped to have been told about, and offered, the version of OMAP4 that supported the RTC over a year ago when it was first produced (see Chris Evans’ last 2 posts of 7/3/14 in this thread). I would have discovered and had corrected the hardware fault on the board a year ago and had a working RTC from then. |
Chris Evans (457) 1614 posts |
Dave: As a commercial body we can’t distribute ROM builds without paying a licence fee. When you purchased the module, RTC support existed in builds by Willi and it was expected to be added to the ROOL builds within a few weeks, we had no control over the delay. IIRC you mentioned at the time getting a Panda Build from Keith Dunlop which I knew had RTC support in it. Unfortunately I was never aware that you were using a build without RTC support. |
David R. Lane (77) 766 posts |
@Chris |
Pages: 1 2