Government launches "investigation" into ARM acquisition
Charlotte Benton (8631) 168 posts |
Interestingly, the objection seems to be based on potential national security implications. |
David J. Ruck (33) 1635 posts |
Fingers crossed. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Oh bollocks. They saw nothing wrong with having ARM flogged off to the Japanese (and part of that going to the Chinese) when it was a great big flag-waving “Britain is open for business!” following the referendum result. They saw nothing wrong with handing the entire Census to Lockheed Martin (which pretty much means the NSA has relevant up to date information on every British household). I’d have been more worried about ARM going anywhere near the Chinese rather than anywhere near the Americans. They’re just trying to find creative ways to attempt to claw back the British success story that they never should have permitted to be sold years ago, but were too busy waving their flags to care. There’s a pile of bones on the ground over there. It’s the horse. It got out, got old, then died. No point attempting to close the stable door now. Note: I would like to see ARM return to the UK and be a processor designer without commercial handicaps, favouritism, asset stripping, or any of the other sorts of things that might happen to it. |
Charlotte Benton (8631) 168 posts |
There’s a difference between Softbank and Nvidia, in that the former’s just a holding company, whereas Nvidia is likely to fundamentally change the way in which ARM does business. |
David J. Ruck (33) 1635 posts |
This is good news. nVidia has some good technical plans for future ARM developments, but nothing they can’t do already with under the terms of their architecture license. The only reason to buy ARM is to exploit its licencing model and/or restrict competitors. ARM would be far more successful if were independent UK company again, as if licencing is squeezed then people will quickly move to RISC V. |
Paolo Fabio Zaino (28) 1882 posts |
Possibly yes, financially it has to be seen however. But I still hope for an independent ARM…
True! |
Paolo Fabio Zaino (28) 1882 posts |
Yup, T.May gave her blessing IIRC… The issues now are far more complicated, it could be that the UK Gov has finally awaken OR that it’s just trying to hold onto ARM for other reasons, hard to say at the moment. |
David J. Ruck (33) 1635 posts |
For years they’ve been asking “how come the UK doesn’t have any tech firms to compete with the US”, then someone pointed out we’d sold the one we had 5 years ago. ARM is a strategic asset, so majority control of the company should be kept with the UK. |
GavinWraith (26) 1563 posts |
<< Hovercraft, motorbicycles, cars, steel manufacture, ARM, … |
Colin Ferris (399) 1814 posts |
Usable Jet Engine. |
David J. Ruck (33) 1635 posts |
You might want to check who was in power when Britain gave up the lead in those areas you mention, and many more. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Which is a discussion that should have happened five (?) years ago.
Anybody who needs to look it up is either a foreigner or a Tory. ;-) Aside: Google keyboard highlighted “Foreigner” in the previous sentence. So I tapped just to see what context it decided. |
Grahame Parish (436) 481 posts |
Swing-wing aircraft (TSR2), maglev trains, the list goes on… |