An inconvenient truth?
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Interesting reading: http://www.vanwensveen.nl/rants/microsoft/IhateMS_1.html |
Raik (463) 2061 posts |
If you want success, steal from the best. |
patric aristide (434) 418 posts |
Yeah well, not exactly news. Gates saw his chance and did what he had to do, even if that required using every dirty trick in the book. I’m not convinced all the now extinct hardware companies can blame Microsoft or IBM for their demise. Same goes for most operating systems, just think of BSD and the Unix Wars or something as ridiculous as Sinclair’s SuperBasic.
I also like how Acorn decided to market Richard Manby’s Arthur Desktop, which he wrote as a demo for programmers (and an unfinished one at that), as actual part of the OS. How’s that for inconvenient truths? (1) http://www.rougol.jellybaby.net/meetings/2012/PaulFellows/index.html (2) “Of the gods we believe, and of men we know, that by a necessary law of their nature they rule wherever they can. And it is not as if we were the first to make this law, or to act upon it when made: we found it existing before us, and shall leave it to exist forever after us; all we do is to make use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same power as we have, would do the same as we do.” |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Ah, but how many people considered the Arthur desktop as much more than a toy? It was a prelude for what was to come, but in itself it was way too simplistic to do a lot. |