Is it just me, or … (ARMARMs)
tymaja (278) 174 posts |
Probably just me, but … When using the ARM ARMs, do you find that, even if using them to look up stuff for ‘modern” ARM32 (ARMv8 AARCH32), some are more useful than others? I have them all in a reference folder. I am working with the RISC OS 5 source code, and, for example, (condition codes encoding / relation to NZCV, and dataproc opcodes) : ARMARM (ARM610) (ARM instruction set encoding) : ARMARMv4 for ‘classic’ ARM32, and ARMARMv6 for ‘next gen’ ARM32 (shifter carryout from shifter operands) : ARMARMv3 (ARM610) has the best explanation by far (finer details of flag changes from operand2, and core instructions) : ARMARMv4 while I need to use ARMARMv8 / ARMARMv7 too, the older ones save a lot of time!) |
nemo (145) 2545 posts |
All documentation is horrible. Except the PostScript Red Book. |