MS developing a modular OS?
Andrew McCarthy (460) 126 posts |
Read more at link Have we seen this before somewhere – a modular OS? ;-) |
Patrick M (2888) 115 posts |
How do you feel about this? |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
It will fail. While the idea is not bad per se, Microsoft is still clinging to the ghost of Windows… The problem is going to be the underlying architecture. It will be possible to slim it down, certainly, but a hulking behemoth is a hulking behemoth no matter what you call it.
Can you smell the sweet smell of “premium feature” here? ;-) |
Clive Semmens (2335) 3276 posts |
To call Windoze a “hulking behemoth” is an insult! to honest to goodness hulking behemoths. |
ronald-scheckelhoff (2262) 60 posts |
I think it’s funny that they selected the name of a famous novel/movie virus for their modular OS. I guess it’s because they’re going to replicate it throughout the gadgets-sphere. |
Tristan M. (2946) 1039 posts |
It’s definitely named after the galaxy, because of the sheer size of MS products. Gigabytes for roughly similar functionality of a Linux version that fits in a few MB. |
Clive Semmens (2335) 3276 posts |
Well…it would have been difficult for them to arrange to name it before the galaxy, certainly.
Poor soul. (I have a Windoze 10 laptop, which I use when I’m away from home, and otherwise to run exactly one program, very occasionally – Microsoft ICE, for those very rare cases where Hugin (on the Mac) mysteriously fails to stitch a panoramic series of photographs. ICE worked on older Windozes, but all those machines are pushing up daisies.) |