Zero pain in Zap during undo
Pages: 1 2
André Timmermans (100) 655 posts |
That reminds me that I have at least another patch to finalize for a crash when adjust closing a new file. Zap attempts to extract a leafname from null filename. I have a fix for that part but there is still a secondary issue in the taskWindowModule. |
RonM (387) 60 posts |
I have been using StrongEd Taskwindow for a long time now, and I’m now on RISCOS 5.24 so things may have changed, but there used to be a problem with Zap taskwindow loosing a character at the line wrap. Edit: Still on version 1.48 tnk-6, it only took |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
How did you manage that? When in a TaskWindow, most of the wrap options are disabled, and the two (Wrap width and Line wrap) don’t change the output. Of course, there is a bug there. Switch to “Auto width” and it all goes wrong. ;-) |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
I’ve put together a full release (Zap Ultimate 1.49). It’s basically (I hope) a fresh installation of Zap updated to the rick05 level. Any willing guinea pigs to give this a spin before I upload it to !Store? http://heyrick.ddns.net/files/zap_ultimate_149.zip (2897KiB) I’ve exorcised the HidePtr module (and scattered salt on the ground because that code was freaky-weird) so it won’t mess up on RISC OS 5.25 (any more than normal ;-) ). Steve, you willing to give this a try yet? |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Note – it uses my revised menu layout, so don’t just drop this one on top of an earlier installation unless you hated the original menu structure as much as I did. nemo also posted his menu layout here, if you’re interested in another possibility: https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/11/topics/11340#posts-78706 |
RonM (387) 60 posts |
How did you manage that? When in a TaskWindow, most of the wrap options are disabled, Using the term ‘line wrap’ may have been confusing, I’m using defaults, except for bigger font. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Minor tweak to the Zap module: 2018/09/25 rick-05 Minor tweak to prevent Zap from ever trying to autoload the HidePtr module, should stop things going wrong if this version of Zap is dropped on top of an earlier installation. Thanks to Anton Reiser for spotting this. HidePtr is like that final boss that just won’t die. :-/ The archive (link above) has been updated accordingly. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Anton has pointed out that there is a problem with Zap’s selections. A triple, quadruple, or quintuple click should select line, paragraph, all (actually I didn’t know Zap did that!) but it gets the selected area quite wrong. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
I have uploaded Zap Ultimate (rick-05 version) to !Store. I have called it “Zap Ultimate” and left the existing Zap in place (but added a note pointing people to this one). Why? Because I don’t know if there are people using !Store on 26 bit systems. The previous Zap should work for them, but the Zap Ultimate makes breaking changes (for instance it ditches support for DebuggerPlus) and in the future will concentrate only on working on 32 bit systems. As such, I decided to leave the existing Zap in case any older systems users might want it, and add this one specifically aimed at 32 bit. Oh, and you’ll be pleased to know I added a note to the file (first thing you’d see) instructing the user that if they’re upgrading a previous installation of Zap, to find HidePtr and bludgeon it to death with an early ’90s flatbed scanner… ;-) |
Matthew Phillips (473) 721 posts |
We’re still using 1.48 (12 Jul 2015) tnk-11 on an ARMX6 (yes, really must upgrade) and the triple, quadruple, quintuple click works fine, at least in C mode. And paragraph selection (quadruple click) selects the whole function you are in, which is rather nice. Though really it would be even handier if it selected the block, and then another click for the parent block etc. |
Chris Hall (132) 3554 posts |
Because I don’t know if there are people using !Store on 26 bit systems. I can confirm there are people using !Store (and !Zap) on VRPC which is 26 bit. and bludgeon it to death with an early ’90s flatbed scanner I have an Epson GT-10000+ A3 SCSI flatbed scanner with sheet feeder but it is too heavy for this purpose (and in frequent use). |
Clive Semmens (2335) 3276 posts |
Oooh green-eyed monster here! We have an Epson Perfection 2400 Photo that I got freecycle, which is very nice. But it’s not A3, and it doesn’t have a sheet feeder… |
Pages: 1 2