The bug tracker is broken
Rik Griffin (98) 264 posts |
Clicking on the “Bugs” link on the web page gives “The requested URL /tracker/ was not found on this server.” |
Andrew Hodgkinson (6) 465 posts |
Yeah, I know, annoying isn’t it… I’ve not had time to fix it yet. I had not even found the time to post a new story explaining the issue until a few minutes ago! Details here: https://www.riscosopen.org/news/articles/2011/11/18/bug-tracker-temporarily-offline |
Rob Heaton (274) 515 posts |
Andrew, have you had a chance to look into the bug tracker problems yet? |
Andrew Hodgkinson (6) 465 posts |
Afraid not. I do have some overdue holiday days that I need to take but I’m loathe to spend those fiddling around with a bug tracker…! We’ll see. Sorry about the ongoing delay, I know it’s pretty ridiculous having it left offline for so long. Trust me, I’ve not forgotten about it. |
Jeffrey Lee (213) 6048 posts |
Might it be worth changing the link to redirect to this section of the forums? That way any newcomers won’t be confused/put off by the broken link. |
Andrew Hodgkinson (6) 465 posts |
I’m experimenting with it, so you may see the bug tracker online – or not. Still seems to cause spins in postgres though. |
Gulli (1646) 42 posts |
What bug tracker is being used? |
Theo Markettos (89) 919 posts |
It’s a Ruby on Rails component… can’t remember exactly what it’s called. |
Steve Revill (20) 1361 posts |
I believe it’s Collaboa. We seem to have a habit of adopting OSS components shortly before they become dead projects… I’m sure this is the second, if not the third, bug tracker we’ve used. |
Gulli (1646) 42 posts |
This has probably been asked several time but have you considered moving to a tracker that’s being actively developed? Are you completely locked in on Ruby? I’m guessing that CVS compatibility is a must – are there any bug trackers left that can read CVS? |
Jeffrey Lee (213) 6048 posts |
The bug tracker appears to be back up now. Hurrah! |
Andrew Hodgkinson (6) 465 posts |
It suffices. I did consider a move to the then-active Retrospectiva project some time ago. It’s not had any commits in two years now, though, so I’m glad I didn’t waste my time. Ruby On Rails was a big thing way-back-when and it did let us get a lot of complex functionality up in quite a short time, with shared templates between all the application sections because they were all in the same language. However, a number of very stupid developer decisions (IMHO) by the RoR team – which persist to this day – mean that while it’s still a very nice framework, it’s doomed to be littered by vast quantities of abandonware. That said, I’m pretty sure that the vast majority of open source software is abandonware – you only hear about active developments in really a very small handful of high profile projects compared to the total number started. Just look at the history of audio players on Linux, for example. Ultimately anything that’s a one-man-band is reliant on that person’s energy and nearly always. when they decide to move on, nobody else has either the talent and/or the motivation to pick it up. |
Gulli (1646) 42 posts |
Good to see the tracker working, now I (and others) can take a look at the bug list and see if there’s something we can help with. |
Andrew Hodgkinson (6) 465 posts |
Seems reasonably stable now (and if that doesn’t curse it nothing will! Heh). So I’ll “unstick” this topic now. |