PocketFS
Rick Murray (539) 13850 posts |
Hi, It has just occurred to me. The Beagle has a serial port. I have a PocketBook II (and a 2Mb 3a). I’ve let them languish as my current machine (the eeePC) has no serial port. And let me tell you – Android phones are great at helping you consume – YouTube, no probs. Video? MP3s? Streaming radio over a crappy EDGE network? Working out how to propose to a cute girl you just met in a language you know nothing about? It’s all possible. Compared to the simple efficiency of the Psion 3a, the modern smartphone that is powerful enough to be able to completely emulate a 3a (via DOSbox) is, for want of a better word, a completely retrograde step when it comes to productivity. Therefore, I would be willing to look at taking a crack at porting Acorn’s PocketFS. Are the sources to this part of the Acorn→Pace→Castle→ROOL stuff? If not, does anybody know who might have them? Best wishes, Rick. Two screenshots to amuse: |
Steffen Huber (91) 1953 posts |
Why not ask Alex Thoukydides for the sources for PsiFS? IIRC, it was a lot better than PocketFS. |
Frederick Bambrough (1372) 837 posts |
Yes, yes, yes! I contacted Alex some time ago (checks – 2006 ooer!) about issues running it on my RPC. Problem is that PsiFS won’t work with 32 bit CLib. To get round it on my Risc PC I would have to substitute CLibs and restart the machine. He thought at the time that he could try to reverse engineer the then new Shared C Library and update CathLibCPP (whatever that is) but seemed a lot of work and maybe not possible. Alternatively, he thought it might be easier to rebuild PsiFS as a 32 bit application. He was disinclined to deal with it at the time because of the amount of work involved and the need to buy Castle’s development kit. His last comment was that he was headed for Asia. |
Ben Avison (25) 445 posts |
I can’t see that we have the sources to PocketFS, I’m afraid. There were patches for it included on disc with RISC OS 3.7 though, which rather suggests that Acorn didn’t have the rights to distribute a StrongARM version of it, implying it was a third-party product. There’s also no signs of it in the allocations database list of filing systems, so I can’t even say who registered it. It might have had a name change at some point during development – there’s one allocation by Computer Concepts that might be a likely candidate, but that is just a guess. |
Theo Markettos (89) 919 posts |
Googling confirms Computer Concepts. Gordon Taylor formerly of CC was at the Cambridge Raspberry Jam the other week – might be worth asking him (his details are on the event page). |