Very slow transfers from NAS to Titanium
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
On the subject of Pi-Hole.
Item 1 might deal with many of the problems with DHCP timeout discussed elsewhere. Finally the front page aspect of Pi-hole is the advert and tracker filtering provided by the main Pi-hole software. Less |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
I did wonder about that one. I assumed the on status was a Titanium supplier recommendation. Fortunately the elderly status of the RO stack means we don’t have to worry about people running a dual (IPv4/IPv6) stack setup. Dual stack is always bad. One or the other folks if you want speed. |
Rob Andrews (112) 164 posts |
changed my setting from 1000 to 100 and i now get an average 40 to 50 kbs transfer speed on my internet downloads which is a lot better than 4 to 5 kbs so result i would say. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Hmmm… When MangaReader is having a good day, or downloading something from a decent server in NetSurf, my Pi2 (still RISC OS 5.23) connected to the internet via a NetGear FS205 switch connected to a Vonets VAP11G WiFi thingy… …can manage around 250Kbytes/sec, which is about half of what my ~3-4Mbit link is capable of, but possibly slightly laggy due to the number of steps involved, poor signal, etc. |
Chris Gransden (337) 1207 posts |
I did the same test on the Titanium running under Debian buster. Downloads using wget average about 48MB/s compared to 2.5MB/s using RISC OS.. |
David Pitt (3386) 1248 posts |
Normally NetSurf on the Titanium downloads to a maximum of 700KiB/s. On the RISC OS Linux port on the RPi4 NetSurf managed 4MiB/s but RO stiffed shortly after.
With Privoxy installed on an RPi3B+ NetSurf on the Titanium can now download at 2MiB/s. This RPi3B+ already has pi-hole on it and provides a small amount of network attached storage with a share. @Chris, thanks for two good tips, pi-hole & the proxy. |
Chris Hall (132) 3554 posts |
4 megabytes per second is quite reasonable. |
Rob Andrews (112) 164 posts |
loaded privoxy on a pi4 am using it now and it is like winning the lotto i can now down load the backdrop images in 3:24 mins great over 900kbs |
Tank (53) 375 posts |
I have been having problems with my Titanium and very slow network performance. I noticed it when !Safestore was running saving to a Windows Server 2016 Enterprise machine with a RAID 6 array as storage (1 × 12.7TB and 1 × 27.2 TB arrays). It was taking minuets to save the individual larger files. |
Tank (53) 375 posts |
Just to note regards the previous message, ShareFS was also slow when moving files to any running RISCOS machine (Pi, Beagle or OMAP5). |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
Managed switches so you should be able to a CLI command like show port all, or show port 1 (if I’ve got the syntax right) to see what the operational mode for port 1 is. Check the duplex and speed settings it ends up at. Doing a speed auto 1000 should set it to auto-negotiate duplex and give 1000 full on a capable device, speed auto 100 same thing for 100Mb. Check also what the current status is of the port the Netgear connects to. |