IZipFS
David Feugey (2125) 2709 posts |
I have some problems to exchange data between my old and new computers. A Zip drive seems to be the best way for this, even if I must admit I never tried to read a Zip under my Pi (with a USB drive). I use a PC to do the job. I saw there is the source code of IZipFS in Gitlab. Is the standalone module available somewhere? Does it work on RISC OS 3.x/4.x/5.x? If it can support a parallel port drive under RISC OS 5, it would be nice for upgraded RPCs. But also for people who want to stay away from piracy. |
Dave Higton (1515) 3525 posts |
What old computer(s) are we talking about here? Wouldn’t a USB key be suitable? |
Andrew McCarthy (3688) 605 posts |
If applicable, there’s also the networking route: ShareFS, Moonfish, Samba, etc. I spotted a bit of related news on Mastodon a few moments ago. Here’s the link. Phil Pemberton wrote: “Got the IZipFS (Iomega Zip) driver working on RISC OS 5!”. :) |
David Feugey (2125) 2709 posts |
USB key, on a RPC? :) Zip is really a good solution here. Very affordable on eBay, reliable and with more than enough capacity. Zip replaced all my floppies on all my computers. I tried networking with many network cards and configurations: it just doesn’t work for me. I suspect because of 10 Mbit issues on my home network. |
David Feugey (2125) 2709 posts |
Nota: I’m really OK with my current configuration. But a 32bit driver interests me too. With the help of Aemulor (and – I can dream – a 32bit port of the PC application), and the 32bit SCSI driver, it could help me to convert a RPC to RISC OS 5. For fun (RPCEmu already does this), but not only. |
Jean-Michel BRUCK (3009) 359 posts |
My Iomega Zip is working with my RiscPC, and with ShareFs, I can get the content on my Armx6. The problem is having a parallel USB adapter that works. |
David Feugey (2125) 2709 posts |
Or to have both parallel and usb zip drives :) |
Steve Fryatt (216) 2105 posts |
As someone who owned a Zip drive in the 1990s and experienced the “click of death” first-hand, I’m struggling to parse that sentence! :-) |
Steffen Huber (91) 1953 posts |
And SCSI (there are universal SCSI/parallel ones, too!). And IDE. When visiting Retro meetings in Germany, this is “standard stuff” and really much better than waiting for the next floppy disc read/write error, or wasting time while fiddling with serial port transfer with broken XModem implementations and creative nullmodem wiring. Those ZIP drives that survived until now (only very few) seem to be very robust. The unreliable ones all died 25 years ago. |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
As someone who had multiple drives for users to deal with, I had to take a break and come back when I was calmer. The escape method was to not press any key at all and hang on for a human. 1 I surprised myself with the degree of calmness. 2 There might have been a bit of confusion about whether to bin the faulty units or ship those back too… |
David J. Ruck (33) 1635 posts |
I can’t believe anyone is contemplating using something as slow and unreliable as Zip drives – get networking working, it is infinitely better. First if you have an old 10BaseT (or god forbid 10Base2) NIC, get a 100MB one, the usual suspects should have one in stock. |
David Feugey (2125) 2709 posts |
Yes, the first version was subject to this default. The later ones are just rock solid. All my drives work today, and most of my zip discs are still OK. Magneto-optical drives are very good too, as long term backup solution. I can’t say the same with floppies, where each tentative to read/write data could be the last, for the medium and the drive.
At wich price? 100 euros + almost the same in postal fees and taxes? Anyway, even if I connect my old computers together, they will not get access to my modern ones, that are in another room. So I’ll still need a way to transfer data between them. For now, as floppies are just unreliable, I replaced them with an IDE Zip drive (Archimedes) and a SCSI Zip drive (RISC PC). On the PC side, in the second room, I use an USB drive. And that’s great. I just plan to convert a RISC PC to RISC OS 5, and one thing that stops me, is the lack of 32bit driver for my parallel port zip drive. So my question. |
David Feugey (2125) 2709 posts |
I do even stranger things, as using RISC OS 5 on a Pi 4 to do my business work and manage my company :) |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
If I suggested that cat5e cable, being an old standard, is cheap and that you could cable between rooms, would that move you toward the network idea? OK, the idea hits a boulder in the road with Ricks mega thick walls inside his mini-castle, but most people have walls and floors more akin to tissue. |
David Feugey (2125) 2709 posts |
It hits a boulder in the road here too, with some thick walls inside a mini-manor :) And I really have too much computers, to equip them all with pricey network cards (when they exists and are available). So, yes, I use and probably will use more network. But, no,I don’t think it will replace physical storage. Anyway, that’s not the question. I have no problem making my computers talk together, even the computers that are not really adapted to networking (my Archimedes, for example). I just saw that IZipFS could be compatible with RISC OS 5, and saw here an opportunity to modernize one of my RISC PC, without loosing connectivity. Even if I give it a network card, a Zip support will be great. |