Lost in the mists of time?
George T. Greenfield (154) 748 posts |
I’ve been trying to remember the name of a TV/film production company, already a user of RiscPCs in its processes which, around the time of Acorn’s demise, proposed a new RISC OS computer featuring the StrongArm CPU, a FPGA to replace the IOMD chip and very high (for the time) memory bandwidth. It /wasn’t/ Microdigital, although they were a contemporary. I think they got to the prototype stage, but ISTR that problems with the FPGA caused the project to be abandoned. After that I stopped taking an interest, so have no idea if they are still in existence. Does this ring a bell with anyone? |
Lee Shepherd (435) 51 posts |
Millipede. The computer was called the Imago |
Lee Shepherd (435) 51 posts |
Sorry the computer was the Nucleus using the Imago mainboard. |
George T. Greenfield (154) 748 posts |
Yep, that was it. Millipede’s boss thought that the massive bandwidth boost would give a healthy increase in performance compared to the RiscPC despite retaining the StrongArm. No doubt he had a point: combining a 233MHz CPU with the RPC’s 16MHz bus was a bit like putting a Chevy V8 in a Ford Popular. |
Steffen Huber (91) 1953 posts |
https://chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/AfterAcorn/Millipede_Imago.html |
David J. Ruck (33) 1635 posts |
Someone should get RISC OS 5 running on those prototype boards, assuming they still work. |
Rob Andrews (112) 164 posts |
I would like too have seen Cineroma finished it looked good at the demo never heard any more about after that. |
George T. Greenfield (154) 748 posts |
Assuming they still exist. I don’t know if Millipede themselves still exist, and even if they do, why keep the failed* prototypes of an obsolete system?
|
Grahame Parish (436) 481 posts |
It was on display at the Acorn show at the Epsom racecourse one year. I think it was just design mockups, but I can’t be sure now after all this time. |
Colin Ferris (399) 1814 posts |
Was there much difference between ARM3 and ARM600 chips in pin output – like used in ARM3 upgrades? |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Well, one is a QFP-160 that can address 64MB maximum with the aid of an external memory manager (MEMC) and the other is a TQFP-144 that can address 4GB and has its own MMU. So… yeah. |
Colin Ferris (399) 1814 posts |
Must of been fun putting a ARM600 into a Arc A540. |
Stuart Swales (8827) 1357 posts |
Bit of a thread hijack here! ARM610 (as per RiscPC) with its internal MMU would be difficult I think without IOMD. Then you quickly end up with a RiscPC. You had already seen this? https://www.4corn.co.uk/articles/arctorpchard/ Using ARM600 in an A540 is a reasonable proposition (for initial development) as it can be interfaced to a MEMC a la VLSI development board http://www.bitsavers.org/components/vti/86CPID2_ARM600_Development_Card_1992/86CPID2_ARM600_Development_Card_1992.pdf and the fact that the processor card was socketed. Wasn’t this the sort of thing AlephOne were thinking of BITD and didn’t come to pass? Probably still be beaten by an A5000 Alpha performance-wise. |
Simon Willcocks (1499) 513 posts |
They’re probably not the same shape, either. |