Aemulor on the Pi 2
Pages: 1 2
Chris Evans (457) 1614 posts |
I’m glad to report that Pi Aemulor appears to work on the Pi 2 with no modification. |
Chris Hall (132) 3554 posts |
!PhotoDesk 3.12 which otherwise aborts on an ARMv7. |
John Sandgrounder (1650) 574 posts |
Justin Fletcher’s EasySockes module. Roger Gammans’s SocketFS module |
Colin Ferris (399) 1814 posts |
I believe RComp has a patch for PhotoDesk for ARM7. I did a 32bit version of EasySocket ages ago. Don’t know about SocketFS – is there a site for download? |
John McCartney (426) 147 posts |
I still use TableMate and (very) occasionally, Diagrammit. |
Frank de Bruijn (160) 228 posts |
So did I and at least one other (Stefan Bellon? not sure…). Justin has expressly forbidden people to release 32 bit versions of his software to the public. I realise that was many years ago, but I haven’t heard he changed his mind. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
<sigh> |
Chris Evans (457) 1614 posts |
Photodesk 3.12 runs on the Pi 2 without Aemulor:-) EDIT: Addition for clarity: |
Chris Hall (132) 3554 posts |
PhotoDesk 3.12 will not load a JPEG on the Pandaboard without aborting. Also it will not start up without a ‘cache off’. Aemulor solves these bugs. |
John Sandgrounder (1650) 574 posts |
@Colin, You can see the link for SocketFS.zip on this page. http://www.drobe.co.uk/archives//ftp.mirror.ac.uk/collections/hensa-micros/local/riscos/internet/?4 Shame about the 32bit version of EasySockets. But at least it still works on VRPC and Aemulor on a Pi 1. I can’t try it on a Pi 2. |
Raik (463) 2061 posts |
Have you try to delete ore move the clipboard? Any problems with Photodesk comes from the clipboard. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Does anybody have a link for Easysocket or its documentation? I dimly remember it from years gone by but don’t think I ever used it. Just wanted to see what it actually does because the socket stuff isn’t that hard, just a bit of a PITA.
…actually makes for depressing reading, all that. :-( |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Finally found v1.08 here → https://web.archive.org/web/20010802021428/http://freenet.barnet.ac.uk/freenet/j.fletcher/modules/esockets-108 Looks like a useful thing, and I’m mentioned by name for receiving an early version. I really don’t remember that. |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
http://web.archive.org/web/20010606110420/http://freenet.barnet.ac.uk/freenet/j.fletcher/modules/ combination of google for a url that wasn’t movspclr1 and wayback for the archive copy 1 wayback caught the link page but not the zip file behind it. |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
No shortage of tosspots. I see you found the same link, probably around the same time, but without an interruption from one who must be attended. (Small, furry, requiring sustenance) |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Sadly the truth. I just wish they went fruity and left us in peace.
Well, there’s the conundrum. Half of me says he is being immature and we’re all suffering because of a tosspot who didn’t even have the courage to say it as their real name. The other half of me agrees, there comes a point where the hassle just doesn’t justify the effort. And coming at a time when the community picked sides and 32 bit was “the wrong side” from his point of view. Hmmm… I hope Mr. Bin Laden is happy, sticking it to one of the most active and knowledgable people of the RISC OS community. Yes, there was a lot of “trouble” (understatement!) regarding the 26/32 factions, but to send that sort of message is uncalled for. I note that there is no freely available 32 bit version of ESocket, only some private conversions that others have done, so asswipe didn’t even manage to do that much. Hehe, isn’t that always the way? A load of hot air rubbing people up the wrong way…
Ah, I cheated. I fed the fat furry and parked it on a sunny windowsill and then looked. I managed to get a few minutes of peace. ;-) |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
I think you would agree that Justin is “troubled” whether the RO wars had any part in that is unknown. Certainly didn’t help.
There are three in the management team: Freddie1, Merlyn2, and Minnie3 1Look up turkish van cat and then think runt of litter,long haired. Also known as wussboy. Dislikes being brushed. Likes the jelly or gravy not the bits, Eats Iams, Science Plan etc for solids. 4 Yes, that’s three long haired cats that dislike being brushed. Merlyn had anaesthetic for some tooth work the other week and the vet took the opportunity to brush out all tangles – even he worries |
John Sandgrounder (1650) 574 posts |
Justin’s Easy Sockets got, at least, as far as version 1.18. (The one I am using) |
Robert Hampton (1923) 57 posts |
I remember the disappearance of EasySockets really stung me at the time. I’d been using it to take some baby steps into RISC OS internet programming. It being unavailable for 32-bit only machines (and then, not at all) really put me off, and made me wonder why I was bothering with RISC OS at all. But hey, over a decade later and I’m here! Just realised I have a copy of EasySockets 1.18 (09 Feb 2002); possibly the last released version, sitting in the HostFS folder on my Mac (RPCemu here is still emulating RO4). The Help file says “May be freely distributed, so long as it is not modified and no charge other than copying costs are charged for it. It may not be included with any commercial product without my permission. The copyright remains with myself (Justin Fletcher).” So if anyone does want a copy of the 26-bit version (obviously not much use on RO5 without Aemulor) I’m happy to email it to them. |
WPB (1391) 352 posts |
Has anyone tried emailing Justin recently to see if his position on these things has changed, now that some time has passed? I think I can speak for pretty much everyone here when I say that we all respect the guy and admire his genius. Such a shame to lose him. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Can you please send me a copy of the help file with the changes at the end, so I can see what changed since v1.08? |
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
Back when he issued his RISC OS Rambles, I had a number of observations and questions. |
Robert Hampton (1923) 57 posts |
Emailed (I hope the Yahoo address on your website is still current!) |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Thank you.
Yup. The part of my site that is updated the most is my blog, and it is the same address there at the top of each page. http://www.heyrick.co.uk/blog/ I’m wondering if I should just redirect my site main index directly to my blog and “tidy up” everything else? My film reviews are ages old, does anybody ever look at the Willow pictures? Networking RISC OS with Windows for Workgroups!?!? |
Theo Markettos (89) 919 posts |
Rick, one option is to redo indexes so that the old stuff is hidden in the proverbial disused lavatory marked ‘beware of the leopard’ – in other words, reference it in an obscure corner somewhere. Links will still work, Google will still find it if people really care, but most people won’t have to see the ‘last updated 1996’ stuff unless they go looking for it. Sometimes the old stuff can be important because every other site has bitrotted. |
Pages: 1 2