Cortex-A8 software compatibility list slightly reorganised
Pages: 1 2
Jeffrey Lee (213) 6048 posts |
They could probably do with going into a new category, although I’m not sure what would be the most appropriate. |
Trevor Johnson (329) 1645 posts |
Maybe something like “Utilities / Electronics interfacing”? |
Trevor Johnson (329) 1645 posts |
As an addendum to the proposals, what are people’s thoughts on uploading Martin Wuerthner’s "ARMv7 compatible" logo to the wiki and using it within the list? IMHO it’s not so garish as to be a huge distraction when browsing through. Perhaps it could be tried out and just reverted if disagreeable. |
Trevor Johnson (329) 1645 posts |
Done. If anyone thinks it’s a pants idea then please feel free to revert it. |
Trevor Johnson (329) 1645 posts |
Should this now be renamed to “ARMv7 software compatibility list” or similar? The Cortex-A9 machines are ARMv7 too, aren’t they? AIUI, software’s running alright on the Pandaboard. |
Steve Revill (20) 1361 posts |
I agree. And the logos look good to me. |
Trevor Johnson (329) 1645 posts |
OK. And there’s now the Cortex-A8 hardware compatibility list to be addressed. |
Pages: 1 2