A better Textile reference
Rick Murray (539) 13850 posts |
The only thing suckier than Textile itself is the documentation that is very definitely not clear. I have, therefore, searched around for a more precise and more logical description of Textile markup. I suggest that this, if it accurately describes the version of Textile in use, be linked to in the reference below, instead of the lucklustre document that is there. http://blog.thought-mesh.net/static/docs/mtmanual_textile2.html |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wouter Rademaker (458) 197 posts |
GraphBench 1.00 benchmark comparison All values in activity per second (i.e. higher is better) A is ‘Risc PC 4.02’
|