RISC OS to other ARM boards
Ross McGuinness (1739) 66 posts |
Is it possible to use RISC OS on this board? http://www.hardkernel.com/renewal_2011/products/prdt_info.php I’m not into the technical side of things, just curious about the possibilities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trevor Johnson (329) 1645 posts |
There are a number of previous references to Exynos in the forum threads, but I don’t know about the docs. If you manage to find anything by searching, please let us know! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eric Rucker (325) 232 posts |
Personally, I’d be inclined to say to go for the Arndale Board (which has been discussed elsewhere on this forum) instead. Right now, RISC OS can only use one core, and there’s already a decent Cortex-A9 platform (only dual core, but that doesn’t actually matter right now) available in the PandaBoard ES, and RISC OS is already running on that. The Arndale Board uses a 1.7 GHz Cortex-A15-based Exynos 5 Dual, and there’s shipping products, including a laptop, using it now. Newer SoC, meaning there’s more time before it’s obsolete, and more power available to RISC OS. While DMIPS is a mediocre comparison, I’ll use it anyway, because it’s available. The DMIPS total column is just for reference – realize that that will only be achieved with sufficiently parallelized software or heavy enough multicore aware multitasking, which is completely non-existent on RISC OS. So, ignore that column until a truly multiprocessing capable RISC OS is available.
**StrongARM result is of an SA-110 actually given 66 MHz memory (so, in a RiscPC, a Kinetic card). A RiscPC without a Kinetic can be much, *MUCH* slower. Also, the SA-110 isn't actually an SoC, but it's included for completeness. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steve Pampling (1551) 8170 posts |
What he said, plus http://www.arndaleboard.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page and (I believe): Of course if no one wants to look at development on a newer Samsung device with USB3 and SATA… |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trevor Johnson (329) 1645 posts |
"Full Schematics will be publically released on 31-January-2013" (ODROID-U, Exynos4412, Sold Out, $69.00). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tim Rowledge (1742) 170 posts |
This one might possibly be of interest too – it looks neatly arranged for putting in a once box (unlike my Pi which has a hedgehog-like bristle of connectors that made it tricky) and a decent price. Somebody needs to rescue it from Android, at the very least! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trevor Johnson (329) 1645 posts |
Looks like the the latest versions of this board. AFAIK Via are far from good with documenting their chips, managing/releasing their driver source code, etc. |