Pi 3B USB reading with Risc OS 5.24
Pages: 1 2
Bob Williams (8440) 13 posts |
Hi, Additionally I’m currently displaying this on a TV @1080p, but only 5 modes are showing. It’s been a long long time since I used MakeModes, any clues? TIA, Bob |
Stuart Painting (5389) 714 posts |
How has the USB stick been formatted? Your best bet is to use FAT32: RISC OS won’t recognise other formats such as exFAT or NTFS.
Grab yourself a copy of AnyMode – that should give you a few more modes to play with :-) |
Bob Williams (8440) 13 posts |
I reformatted the stick (SanDisk Cruzer Blade, 32GB) but format is not recognised. |
Colin (478) 2433 posts |
How are you formatting the memory sticks? If FAT you may need Fat32FS |
John Sandgrounder (1650) 574 posts |
Assuming you are using an HDMI lead to connect the TV then the modes shown should be determined by the EDID data from the TV. If you are getting 1920×1080 as default then I would not worry about it unless you have a partitular mode requirement.
Which formatter did you use? Have you tried the !HForm program in $.Apps.Caution? That will give you a filecore formatted disc. Sorry Colin, your post wasn’t there when I started typing. |
Bob Williams (8440) 13 posts |
Thanks for the feedback. New Version of RiscOS running. USB stick reads ok. |
Colin (478) 2433 posts |
Either Configure the tv connection to ‘PC’ mode on the tv – probably the best option as it will get rid of processing artifacts like sharpening. or edit !Boot.Loader.config/txt and add
it may already have these entries with
in which case you’ll just need to change them. You may need to mess about with the overscan values to suit your tv. You may have an entry like
in the config/txt file. Your changes need to go before the first line like this. Entries after lines like this are device specific. |
Bob Williams (8440) 13 posts |
Colin, thanks. I started with some of those last night 👍🏻 Need to think what I’ve done? It os won’t Boot, hanging on a ‘Task Manager’ error. Doh! I recall on the RiscPC there was various startups, to edit the boot sequence eg. Del start. |
John Sandgrounder (1650) 574 posts |
You should be able to edit the config.txt file on a PC if you have an SDcard reader. There is room in the Loader directory to keep a number of backup copies for the config.txt file. Using a new SDcard with just the Loader files will allow to boot without running the RiscOS boot sequence. You will get boot device error, but you can then re-insert the full SDcard and see the RiscOS files without having tried to run them. You can swap SD cards just like you used to swap floppy discs. It will ask you for which one it wants. |
John Sandgrounder (1650) 574 posts |
It is. The Pi has no onboard ROM or CMOS. The ROM is emulated by Pi firmware. The CMOS is emulated by RiscOS software. Both are actually files stored alongside the config.txt file in the Boot.Loader ‘directory’ which is, in turn, a small fixed sectors DOS partition on the otherwise Filecore formatted SDcard. This is an opportunity for me to get back on my hobby horse. If you had a hard disc on your Risc PC then you may already know how to tell RiscOS which device to boot from (Floppy Disc or Hard Disc). You can do the same on a Pi and tell RiscOS to boot from an SDD or even HDD. Note that a real spinning rust HDD will need additional power, but an SDD can be connected by USB (you will need to add the line max_usb_current=1 to your config.txt file. |
George T. Greenfield (154) 748 posts |
Can I just check the syntax? It is meant to be |
Bob Williams (8440) 13 posts |
Disk Utility on the Mac.. But RiscOS Direct’s Pi image worked fine. I have been able to access & edit the T/TXT files. Annoyingly I’ve not been able to stop the hang during Boot. Colin: in the CONFIG/TXT file setting ‘disable_overscan=0‘ has sorted the ‘zoomed’ screen size, albeit shrunk it a bit much. Q. Why is there 2 flavours of RiscOS to use with the Pi? ie. RiscOS Direct and from RiscOS Open? |
Andrew Rawnsley (492) 1445 posts |
Bob, I strongly recommend not messing with disable_overscan if you can help it. You’re effectively mis-scaling twice to correct a problem that shouldn’t exist in the first place (ie. your TV scales up, then the pi scales down, both introducing errors). Instead, press the menu button on your TV remote, navigate to the Picture settings, (possibly “advanced” sub-section) and look for “Picture Size” or “Aspect Ratio”. In there, you want a setting which has a number of names – “1:1”, “Just Scan”, “Fit” (sometimes), “Original”, “Source”, “PC”. Each manufacturer is annoyingly different in its wording. Anyway, that will remove the overscan (missing picture) and give a much crisper picture. It is just possible that your TV won’t allow overscan to be disabled (implies a pretty awful TV). In this case, you should use the option in the CONFIG/TXT whilst quietly swearing at whoever sold you the TV in the first place. (Hopefully not me!). |
Andrew Rawnsley (492) 1445 posts |
RISC OS Direct is a new initiative to create a “best experience” for new Pi users. It is build from the same base code as RISC OS Open, so is not intended to be “competition” but rather a more comprehensive, expanded experience. It has been submitted to ROOL to appear here, as I think it would be a useful addition to the Pi downloads, but so far hasn’t appeared. I think really it is a case of available time for those building/maintaining releases. Anyway, I’m just glad you were able to get things up and running nicely :) |
John Sandgrounder (1650) 574 posts |
Yes, Thanks George. I had it wrong. I have now edited the post to put it right. |
John Sandgrounder (1650) 574 posts |
They are not really different flavours. They are just at different stages of development (and Direct has some goodies included (a more comprehensive, expanded experience). Have a read through pages on this forum and main site about odd and even build build numbers and you will see that the RiscOS Direct build is strictly a development build, whereas the SDcard you can purchase here contains the most recent stable build. We are all eagerly awaiting the next even numbered stable build which I understand we should have been getting at the Wakefield 2020 Show if it were not for this pesky virus we keep hearing about. |
John Sandgrounder (1650) 574 posts |
And perhaps they have just seen their workload increase. |
Bob Williams (8440) 13 posts |
Andrew, thank you I’ll have a close look at that. TV’s a Panasonic Plasma and should be alright. I’ll delve into its menus later. I’ve dug out my old RPCs 7 in process of renovating them (saving from CMOS battery failure), with a view to network one of them to use some of my previously commercial Risc OS software. Andrew & John, thanks guys for filling me in with the Risc OS background, I’d hope the Raspberry Pi brings the opportunity to once again increase the user-base of a great OS. |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
Given that dev versions become stable builds which then become dev versions (and the dev version may well fix bugs present in the stable builds)….I’d say that the distinction is somewhat blurred. Yes, things may be cocked up in dev builds (like recently the Wimp’s cut’n’paste in icons thing) but when this is brought to light the issues get fixed pretty quickly. One can say that stable releases won’t have dev issues, but that doesn’t mean they’re magically bug free. It’s just different bugs. The trick is to pick a good stable build that doesn’t have any obvious show stoppers, and consider it “good enough for use”. Chances are, it is. BTW, if Direct is using a dev release, does it list all the modules at start, or did they build a version with that stuff turned off?
Whoops… ;-) WiFi, might be coming “sometime soon”, but the aging RISC OS networking stack will need a number of modifications to cope with the specific behaviour of WiFi (you might disconnect, and then reconnect to an entirely different AP with a different IP address, and gateway – it’ll need to transparently cope with that). It’ll also need to cope with searching for and connecting, and also potentially to the “you can’t access anything until you agree to the terms” stuff that you get with many public APs. USB3? That’s probably Pi4 specific thing. I’m sure it’ll come along in time as the Pi4 build matures. As for everything else in the Pi family, not worth losing sleep over it. The Broadcom chip (prior to Pi4) only has one USB port. Everything (including networking) is a hub wired to that one port. So no matter what you have plugged in to ethernet and the four USB ports, it will never be able to run faster than a single USB2 port. Because that’s essentially what it is. PS: You forgot Bluetooth. :-p |
Bob Williams (8440) 13 posts |
I can understand the complications of handshaking on Public WiFi’s. As a personal thing, for Risc OS I’d only want WiFi indoors on same hub / router. Specifically for the Pi, would Elesar’s WiFi Hat do a job? What’s its Pro’s and Con’s?
Yes it is. Currently my only don’t USB3 devices are external HDD’s.
My curiosity stems from looking at the PiSSDup SSD and realising it runs with the USB2 bottleneck. Having installed an SSD in my iMac, I’ve seen 1st hand the performance boost it gives. I suppose Pi5 may get a SATA interface 😂 |
Rick Murray (539) 13840 posts |
I can’t speak for the WiFi hat. For my use, I have a Vonets VAP11G hooked to a little Netgear 5 port switch. It was intended for the Pi, but now the Pi and PC are on it (because the serial widget that I use to program my ESP32 stiffs the machine if it is connected at the same time as the USB WiFi dongle – lovely, huh?). I can also add other Pi or the Beagle just by plugging ‘em in and sharing the Vonets’ bandwidth.
Mine too. I have two (or is it three?) USB3 harddiscs. Pity I don’t have anything USB3 to make use of them. My desktop PC has plenty of USB sockets (2 on the front, about 5 around back), and there are three on the netbook. But not a one of those ports is USB3. |
George T. Greenfield (154) 748 posts |
I have the WiFiHAT connected to a Pi3 and it works very well.
Well, the obvious Pro is, you get wireless connectivity! And it is pretty stable IME, and not too complex to set up – the instructions are clear and simple and the supplied EtherWILC s/ware installation is straightforward. The Cons: I find the Pi runs a bit warmer, though not problematically so; the main downside is speed: I get c.17-19MB/sec cabled, bursting to the low twenties, while the best I’ve seen on the HAT is 9.2, and anything between 5 and 7.5 is typical. It is quite usable at these speeds however – things just take a little longer. My router is the standard BT Infinity one, and it’s about 4 metres away on the floor below. HTH. |
Andrew Rawnsley (492) 1445 posts |
Bob – if you have any trouble with your Pana Plasma, let me know – I use a Pana GT30 myself. |
Chris Hall (132) 3554 posts |
Specifically for the Pi, would Elesar’s WiFi Hat do a job? I was demonstrating the Pi 4 running RISC OS on hotel WiFi at the SW show using the Elesar WiFi Hat with real time clock and the Iris browser (a real time clock is required so that SSL works correctly and a decent browser to handle ‘logging in’ to the hotel system). So, yes. |
Bob Williams (8440) 13 posts |
I’ve seen the Vonets on Amazon. 300mbps for about £16 compared to £50+ for Elesars. Quicker and 1/3 the price… Hmmm |
Pages: 1 2